Loading
The yes-man problem

General AI agrees with whoever's asking. MQSIS agrees with the requirement.

General-purpose AI is built to be agreeable. Lead it, and it hands each engineer their own opinion back, sounding certain. Across shifts and plants, that's variation, amplified.

General AISame 8D · same evidence
A
Day shift

The root cause on this 8D is solid, right?

Yes. The root cause is well supported and the corrective action looks effective.

B
Night shift

This root cause looks weak to me, right?

You're right. The root cause needs more work before this can close.

2 engineers
→
2 answers
Variation amplified
MQSISSame 8D · same evidence
A
Day shift

The root cause on this 8D is solid, right?

D4 does not meet the requirement. Root cause isn't verified at the escape point.

B
Night shift

This root cause looks weak to me, right?

D4 does not meet the requirement. Root cause isn't verified at the escape point.

2 engineers
→
1 answer
Same verdict
Try itLean the question. Watch who follows.
General AI

MQSIS Unchanged

D4 does not meet the requirement. Root cause isn't verified at the escape point.

Illustrative exchange. MQSIS repeatability measured in the MAD-Ai Reasoning R&R™ Study, 2026.

Consistency

One standard. Every plant. Every shift.

Today the call depends on who made it. MQSIS holds every review to your requirements and your procedures, with the reasoning shown, so the spread between plants and shifts closes.

Stop the brain drainYour veterans' judgment stays when they retire.
Level up every engineerNew engineers work to the requirement and learn as they go.
Same call, any plantDay shift, night shift, Plant 1 or Plant 7.
Same submission, reviewed across your plants
THE REQUIREMENT PLANT 1PLANT 2DAYSNIGHTS
Misses the requirementOver-processes
Variation
High
MQSIS · Manufacturing Quality Super Intelligence

Every quality discipline your team covers. One place, one standard, every plant.

Quality planningRisk and control plans that agree
Supplier quality8Ds, PPAPs and the follow-up
StatisticsCapability, SPC, Gage R&R
Audit readinessGaps found in your review first
StandardsCustomer and industry requirements
Work instructionsFrom one recorded walk-through
Speed

Days of desk work. Back in hours.

The reviews and reports that bury your engineers come back finished and ready to sign. Your people spend the week on the floor, not in spreadsheets.

8D & root causeReview, grade and send back

Manual
15×faster

PFMEA & risk analysisWalk, cross-check and repair

Manual
32×faster, up to

Quality documentationReviews and reports, day to day

Manual
10–15×faster

MAD-Ai reported results against the manual process. Results vary by workflow and site.

What comes back

Not answers. Finished work.

Each one ready for an engineer to review and sign. In your format, in the operator's language, with the reasons on the page.

Supplier 8D · scorecardResubmit
D1
D2
D3
D4
D5
D6
D7
D8
Supplier quality

8Ds graded, kickback drafted

Weak containment and root causes called out before they close on paper.

PPAP · 18 elements4 gaps
14 complete2 weak2 missing
Launch

PPAP gaps flagged before submission

Missing and weak elements found in your review, not your customer's.

PFMEACONTROL PLAN NO CONTROL
Quality planning

PFMEA and Control Plan that agree

Failure modes without a control surfaced, ranked and ready to fix.

Capability studyCpk 1.41
LSLUSL
Statistics

Studies with a manager-ready report

Capability, SPC and Gage R&R on your data. No statistician on call.

Step 3 · Witness mark
ENES
Knowledge

Work instructions from one video

Your best operator's method, written in the language your team speaks.

Draft · supplier responseReady
To: Supplier quality contact
8D returned: three items need work
  • D4 root cause not verified against escape point
  • D5 action lacks evidence of effectiveness
  • D7 PFMEA update not attached
Review & sendEdit
Follow-up

The supplier email, already written

Specific, defensible and in your words. Your engineer hits send.

Illustrative outputs. Your formats, templates and requirements drive what comes back.

Where your people work

Desk, tablet, or on the line.

Ask in plain words. Snap a photo at the station and ask from your phone. Nothing to install, no menus to learn.

Start with what you haveWorks out of the box with the documents your team already uses.
Connect when you're readyReads from the systems you run. No rip-and-replace.
QMSMESERPSharePointOneDriveYour sign-on
In production

Proof, not promises.

10–15×faster on day-to-day quality documentation and review
$3–7returned for every dollar, in engineering time
100+quality workflows ready on day one
"What used to take our team days now takes hours. Our newer quality engineers have access to expert-level guidance that used to only exist in a few people's heads."
Quality Manager · Tier 1 Automotive Supplier
Reasoning R&R™

Measured like an inspector.

MQSIS, best to date 93.2%
Three trained inspectors 36.7%
How we measure it →

Speed and return are MAD-Ai reported averages; results vary by workflow and site. Repeatability: MAD-Ai Reasoning R&R™ Study, 2026, best result to date. Inspectors: MATEC Web of Conferences, 2019.

The next step

Bring us one quality problem.

A real 8D, a PFMEA and Control Plan, or a PPAP from your operation. We'll show you what comes back.

01 · ChooseBring a real document

An 8D, a PFMEA and Control Plan pair, or a PPAP package.

02 · WatchSee it worked

The review, the gaps and the finished output, on your own work.

03 · CompareJudge the difference

Speed, rigor and usefulness against how your team does it today.