You'd pull a gage that reads differently every time. Most AI never gets measured at all. We hold reasoning to the same test: right answer, same answer, any appraiser.
Each one is worthless without the one before it. Consistent means nothing if it's consistently wrong.
Did it think it through? Right evidence, right standard, a result you could defend.
Gate to 02Same inputs, same conditions, run after run. Same depth and the same call.
Gate to 03Different people, same submission, comparable results.
Measured with attribute agreement analysis, the same study you'd run to qualify an inspector. These are our best results to date, from one 8D grading study. Typically, repeatability lands in the high 70s to low 80s and reproducibility at 95% or above; the marked bands show where.
Best results to date from MAD-Ai internal studies, 2026. Not averages; typical results are lower and vary by workflow. Inspector figure: MATEC Web of Conferences, 2019.
AI that's never measured hands back a louder version of whatever went in.
Ask the same question on days and on nights and you can get two different answers from the same evidence. Nobody notices, because both look finished.
The report came back looking finished and professional, and it was wrong. Using it would never have caught that. Measuring it did.
Measurement pinpointed every call that wouldn't hold. Each one was corrected and re-measured until it did, before release.
Known-good documents matched the expert answer on every run. Known-bad documents failed on every run. The controls never moved.
Reasoning R&R™ is an optional program, not a standard feature. It's reserved for the high-stakes workflows where a repeatable call is worth proving.
Not every workflow qualifies. It needs a clear written standard, enough volume and calls that can be judged right or wrong. Many don't, and we'll tell you.
Qualification is set up and priced separately from your subscription, around one workflow and your own documents.
Qualified workflows are re-measured annually. When your standard, process or the workflow changes, it's re-qualified before it goes back into use.
Most of MQSIS doesn't need this. Every workflow is built and tested before it ships. Reasoning R&R™ is for customers who need documented proof on a specific workflow, and results for one workflow or one customer don't carry over to another.
Bring us the work that's backing up your team. We'll show you what comes back, and how we measure it.